#cisco
25 December 2007
Total 7 pages. You are browsing page 4/7.
First :: Prev :: [...] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [...] :: Next :: Last
06:51 <****> exactly
06:51 <****> im out for the night
06:51 <****> good night fellows.
06:52 <****> good night Unter_ thx for the script
06:52 <****> sheesh your email comes with a disclamer?
07:06 <****> wow, the bag of crap sold out in 1 min
08:57 <****> hi all
09:17 <****> Merry Christmas folks
09:22 <****> you too
10:05 <****> hi wat is nat
10:06 <****> nat
10:09 <****> nat?
10:09 <****> network address translation
10:10 <****> yes
10:11 <****> pl explain more
10:11 <****> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/nat-cisco.shtml
10:12 <****> brb
10:14 <****> thanks
13:47 <****> please be advised that #cisco is closed today. No help/support would be given on this special day..Thanks..please come again..
13:49 <****> :)
13:56 <****> :) Merry Christmas
13:57 <****> heh..Merry Christmas to you
14:17 <****> hello
15:01 <****> christmas is over
15:01 <****> finally
15:01 <****> Yay! none of that overrated commercialized holidays!
15:01 * TheDoc dances.
15:02 <****> huh?
15:25 <****> hmm
15:25 <****> let me repeat
15:25 <****> please be advised that #cisco is closed today. No help/support would be given on this special day..Thanks..please come again..
15:25 <****> lol
15:26 <****> bleh, fucking boring day more like
15:29 <****> hypocrisy
15:29 <****> how so?
15:48 <****> is WRED suitible for slowing down tcp traffic on a 2mbit link?
16:07 <****> i have a question: if route A send a update to router B, which router increment the Hop, Metric ? ( Router A ? )
16:08 <****> an
16:18 <****> deny ip any any , applied on outbound of all interfaces. why do i still have bgp neighborship established?
16:30 <****> perhaps it doest apply to already established sessions
16:30 <****> doesnt
16:31 <****> it = the acl
16:35 <****> i did clear ip bgp *
16:35 <****> the funny thing, i can ping as well :P
16:35 <****> Mahmoud: did u applied the rules to your interfaces?
16:35 <****> yeah
16:36 <****> it seems every traffic from internal the router is passed outbound
16:49 <****> Nitrate:
16:49 <****> Happy Holidays man
16:49 <****> same to u
16:49 <****> what you doing todaY?
16:49 <****> btw the newer ios disable inverse arp by default?
16:49 <****> yes
16:49 <****> that sucks, i was wondering for a good while
16:49 <****> heh
16:50 <****> after generations of pain they disabled it
16:51 <****> Mahmoud: good thing i didn't discover that during exams time
16:51 <****> ouch you were in an exam
16:52 <****> DarkeLite, are you sure about the new default setting? the command reference or 12.4 says default enabled
16:53 <****> Nitrate, do you mean inverse? :P
16:53 <****> yes
16:54 <****> frame relay
16:54 <****> hmmm the command reference says enabled
16:55 <****> k
16:55 <****> i'm gonna blame it on dynamips :P
16:56 <****> what's your ios version that doesn't use inverse arp by default with dynamips?
16:56 <****> 12.4
16:56 <****> 12.4(xx) ?
16:57 <****> 124-1c
16:58 * Mahmoud shrugs
16:59 <****> Mahmoud: don't take advice from darkelite, he never knows :P
17:00 <****> you mean, THE DarkeLite?
17:00 <****> yup
17:01 <****> if i was jew, i would say D*******t
17:02 <****> lol
17:03 <****> Merry Christmas
17:03 <****> hey kreg
17:10 <****> DarkeLite, wazzup buddy? :-) long time no see
17:12 <****> yea Mahmoud
17:17 <****> hmm
17:17 <****> it's enabled by feault
17:18 <****> Nitrate: you want to take 2yrs to do that CCNA
17:19 <****> when i was in cisco academy, they did take 2 years for ccna
17:21 <****> 1 week per chapter .. huge
17:22 <****> did any one work with CBAC? i can't get the point of the ACL in this page http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios124/124cg/hsec_c/part15/ch05/h_insrg.htm#wp1036826
17:28 <****> maybe it's just that you need an acl to permit the traffic, and then cbac further restricts it
17:29 <****> i.e. the cbac doesn't override access-lists
17:29 <****> just a guess
17:29 <****> merry xmas!
17:31 <****> dude
17:32 <****> november2, what i know is htat CBAC creates pinholes rather than restricting further more
17:32 <****> gah.
17:36 <****> 192.168.22.14(2268), 1 packet
17:36 <****> the inspect should not apply to it!!! it is in the fucking tunnel!
17:38 <****> did you apply the inspect on the physical interface, or the logical tun ?
17:40 <****> the interface. there is no REAL tunnel as in TUN int as it his is a IPSEC one made under the crypto ipsec section
17:42 <****> hum. i think i need another acl for the crypto map..
17:42 <****> i forgot to do it in both directions so voip will not work :)
17:43 <****> lol @ DarkeLite, at least i didn't failed puesocode assignment :P
17:43 <****> hum. that does not make sense tho as i could ping from the otherside when i tried it.
Total 7 pages. You are browsing page 4/7.
First :: Prev :: [...] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [...] :: Next :: Last