#cisco
25 December 2007
Total 7 pages. You are browsing page 5/7.
First :: Prev :: [...] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [...] :: Next :: Last
17:43 <****> Bawbatos, is this udp packet used by an application inside the tunnel? or the tunnel it self?
17:44 <****> it is the asterisk server doing sip to the phone
17:44 <****> so remote asterisk local phone
17:44 <****> the tunnel has this :
17:44 <****> and you are doing ip inspect name foo sip ?
17:44 <****> as a map - access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.22.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.119.0 0.0.0.255
17:44 <****> access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.119.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.22.0 0.0.0.255
17:44 <****> no
17:45 <****> and the inspect should not apply to anything from the tunnel
17:45 <****> afaik
17:48 <****> lol'
17:48 <****> guys
17:48 <****> no Cisco hELp today
17:49 <****> pls go and celebrate with you'll family
17:49 <****> have fun
17:49 <****> play in snow..
17:49 <****> meRy ChristmaS ;P
17:49 <****> well except Nitrate..he's a bachelor..and lives alone..with cats
17:49 <****> DarkeLite, do you have snows?
17:49 <****> no
17:49 <****> not here
17:49 <****> only 2 seasons
17:50 <****> Rainy season and dry season..
17:50 <****> nothing close to that
17:50 <****> and which country is that if i might ask?
17:50 <****> darkelite at least my gf isn't humping around :P
17:51 <****> ho ho!
17:57 <****> so ipsec is not part of ccie r&s
17:59 <****> no, doesn't seem to be
17:59 <****> where are the old days when ISDN was part of it, bunch of other voip stuff.. :P
18:00 <****> okay, i am being brain dead...
18:00 <****> it's xmas!
18:01 <****> i have ip access-list ext inside; per udp any any; permit ip any any; deny ip any any log
18:01 <****> thinking isn't a option!
18:01 <****> and that is on the internal int e1/0
18:01 <****> so that should let anything go into that interface right?
18:02 <****> anyone disagree?
18:06 <****> well i answered the ipsec question - less then 12.3.4 you need to allow encryp and non-encyp on the external if.
18:06 <****> lame
18:09 <****> who girl humped around
18:10 <****> however it still does not explain why i need an acl 102 local net any any when i have the ext inside as above
18:27 <****> i have 2 computers not showing up on my vista network (icons not there) however i can access them via \\computername fine, this happened since we added a cisco series 800 router to my lan, is it something obvious?
18:27 <****> not really
18:28 <****> vista is not obvious
18:28 <****> vista is like a rock. Mostly useless unless you're tossing into a lake
18:28 <****> allright
18:28 <****> i know its not an OS problem, cause I have linux boxes and xp boxes on my network
18:29 <****> some can be seen and some cant
18:29 <****> the router shouldnt change anything unless it's between the 2 pcs
18:29 <****> are the 2 machines vista?
18:29 <****> i have a linksys router and a cisco router
18:29 <****> no
18:29 <****> and it was fine prior to the router installation
18:29 <****> you're talking about network neighborhood stuff?
18:29 <****> yes
18:29 <****> are they fine if you undo it?
18:29 <****> didnt try cause i need the router for my static ip address
18:29 <****> my isp installed it
18:30 <****> 6 pcs
18:30 <****> mostly just make sure Computer Browser and Workstation services are on
18:30 <****> otherwise that stuff should just be automatic
18:30 <****> allright
18:30 <****> im gonna chat with someone at linksys
18:30 <****> on their site
18:30 <****> again
18:30 <****> yeah router shouldn't cause a problem. it's a local network issue
18:30 <****> ok
18:31 <****> i even added all the hosts to HOSTS file on vista
18:31 <****> yeah that won't affect network neighborhood
18:31 <****> weird that i can access them
18:31 <****> but not view the icons
18:31 <****> that's completely different and unrelated to name resolution
18:32 <****> i installed the tdlp thing to on the xp computer
18:32 <****> that just depends on NetBIOS being enabled, and the Computer Browser and Workstation services being on
18:32 <****> and checked some netbios settings
18:32 <****> what can i check in netbios
18:32 <****> just that it's on ;)
18:32 <****> in the protocols?
18:32 <****> under tcp/ip, I think there's a checkbox for it
18:32 <****> ok
18:32 <****> Netbios over TCP/IP
18:33 <****> yeah its checked "netbios over tcp/ip"
18:33 <****> because all my addresses are satic vs dhcp
18:33 <****> *static
18:35 <****> vista is like a rock. Mostly useless unless you're tossing into a lake
18:35 <****> haha
18:35 <****> I loled at that
18:36 <****> the 2 items not showing are unique though
18:36 <****> one is an xp computer
18:36 <****> i only have 1 xp computer
18:36 <****> and the other is a linksys nas device nslu2 of which i flash debian etch on it
18:36 <****> *flashed
18:37 <****> haha
18:39 <****> probably a useful detail
18:39 <****> allright
18:39 <****> beyond my knowledge though
18:39 <****> but it does have nothing to do with the router
18:39 <****> ok thats what i wanted to make sure
18:39 <****> thanks guys
18:43 <****> oh yeah
Total 7 pages. You are browsing page 5/7.
First :: Prev :: [...] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [...] :: Next :: Last