#cisco
03 January 2008
Total 4 pages. You are browsing page 4/4.
First :: Prev :: [...] [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] :: Next :: Last
01:02 <****> i know there's a small one
01:03 <****> Cisco Catalyst 3560G-24TS
01:03 <****> 24 Ethernet 10/100/1000 ports and 4 SFP ports
01:03 <****> you could do 2960, if you only need l2
01:04 <****> well yea i wouldnt need a l3 swtich if i can do this at l2 with pvlans :)
01:04 <****> stick all the boxes on the same subnet, but they wont be able to talk to eachother so yea
01:05 <****> the main thing is security and liability, making sure random idiots dont mess with other boxes on their internal backup lan ports (that are probably unfirewalled, not our problem to deal with whats on the boxes, hence why id prefer to do it at the network hw level)
01:06 <****> why the need for extra security
01:06 <****> their customers servers, and id prefer to not get the call saying "oh my box got hax0red" because they left their backup lan port unfirewalled like an internal lan
01:08 <****> i think thats a fair call wouldnt you say :)
01:08 <****> due to the amount of data being pushed though its hard to keep the $ down, with the nature of the data being backups and all
01:09 <****> hosting?
01:09 <****> \ya
01:09 <****> ahve a server on the way from LT
01:09 <****> they're slacking
01:09 <****> hehe :)
01:11 <****> so 2960s are fine with private vlans?
01:11 <****> from what i can see its mentioned, but not in very much detail
01:13 <****> o0...
01:13 <****> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/63.html
02:00 <****> what is the proper terminology for the "address-family ipv4" context under bgp
02:00 <****> ipv4 unicast routing?
02:02 <****> ipv4 afi
02:02 <****> yeah thats what i thought
02:02 <****> rather unicast ipv4 afi
02:02 * Unter_ needs to brush up on bgp/mp-bgp again
02:03 <****> nice
02:03 <****> internetworkpro came up on google for the first time for one of my search terms
02:03 <****> loceur: really?
02:04 <****> thats kinda scary
02:04 <****> MPLS with L3VPNs - Internetworkpro
02:04 <****> that means people are linkin to it
02:05 <****> also scary
02:34 <****> an you do layer 3 switches in dyanmips?
02:34 <****> nope
02:35 <****> just routers
02:35 <****> 7200's to emulate my 6500's
02:35 <****> kew
02:35 <****> thx tim
02:35 <****> you can use an etherswitch module in the 3640 on their i think
02:35 <****> how the hell are ya
02:35 <****> np
02:35 <****> good.. you?
02:39 <****> good
02:39 <****> stressin
02:40 <****> so you have to load a start up config with gns
02:40 <****> cant just start from scracth
02:40 <****> you can
02:42 <****> even if you HAD to put in a startup config, just configure a banner or something pointles
02:42 <****> Although your entire existance can no doubt be summed as such
02:42 <****> uh
02:43 <****> conf t; hostname loceur; banner - Under construction, please come back later -;end;wr mem; reload in 18 hours
02:45 <****> config t
02:46 <****> wr erase
02:46 <****> reload
02:46 <****> wait, thats not a config command
02:46 <****> ok, completely off-topic
02:46 <****> im losing it today.
02:46 <****> but i know a few of you in here have macs
02:46 <****> and this mouse accelleration is seriously giving me CT
02:46 <****> yeah, os x mouse acelleration sucks
02:46 <****> how can I dial the mouse accelleration back so when I move it, it doesn't go turbo after a few steps?
02:46 <****> try the app called 'MouseX'
02:46 <****> there's another one called 'Steermouse'
02:47 <****> mouseX, i'll look for that, thanks
02:47 <****> basically, i want it to respond just like an X11 mouse, or as close to that as possible :\
02:47 <****> it's a commandline utility that allows you to alter the mouse scaling. You may find a value that works in conjunction with setting speed
02:47 <****> Steermouse may give more granular results
02:48 <****> ang
02:48 <****> MouseFix not MouseX
02:48 <****> dang
02:48 <****> my bad
02:48 <****> id rather do this on my lab than gns
02:49 <****> this is a PIA
02:50 <****> wow. just wow
02:50 <****> ahahhaha
02:52 <****> im that lazy
03:06 <****> lazy isn't the word that came to mind
03:07 <****> Hey, I have a question... is there a way I can configure my T1 router to allow equal bandwidth per IP on my network when the pipe fills up? So that one person can't pull loads of bandwidth by making a lot of connections, whilst other people can barely get anything through?
03:08 <****> Not sure if IOS could do that.
03:10 <****> MrSmurfing: it's actually setup sorta like that now
03:10 <****> unless you typed no fair-queue
03:10 <****> so it's set fair-queue per IP, not per tcp/ip connection?
03:11 <****> well it's per connection
03:11 <****> that's the problem, it needs to be per IP... because some clients open up loads and loads of connections and take over the bandwidth.
03:12 <****> Or a virus does without them knowing.
03:12 <****> or they're using peer to peer software or something
03:14 <****> MrSmurfing: I've being chaseing a similar setup for a client whom as an internet cafe..
03:17 <****> internet cafe can be easier. max of like 20 users, so bandwidth each ip to 1/2 meg
03:18 <****> that'll guarentee each user gets 1/2 meg
03:19 <****> you can but there's no easy way to do it in ios
03:19 <****> right
03:19 <****> you'd have to match each address in a separate class-map and then police them individually
03:19 <****> bmcgahan_; I'm lost for how one can other than what I just said
03:20 <****> most people use a dedicated qos device like packeteer for something like this
03:20 <****> yeah, ok
03:20 <****> thought that would be the case, but it was worth asking, since I don't know a whole lot about IOS
--- Log closed Fri Jan 04 00:00:12 2008
Total 4 pages. You are browsing page 4/4.
First :: Prev :: [...] [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] :: Next :: Last